Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people claim that societies of the present world impose too much hard and fast rules to follow and obey by the young generation. They refer character build up and disciplined life style to support their viewpoints. However, I strongly disagree with their opinions and believe that rules that are implied for today's youth are perfectly blended for the proper growth of the teenagers because of two specific reasons.
First of all, Strict rules of the socities from modern era prevent the young people to involve some activities that are strongly prohibited from the very early of socialization. For example, modern societies strongly discourage racism and sexism to a greater extent and in some societies even there are strict laws and legislation of punishments who violates those. In the past, these actions were not cared as so pivotal like the present days and consequently, there had been a remarkable ethnic difference among the general mass which often resulted in chaos and nuisance in the society. Precluding racism and sexism in a society is very important because it ensures equality in every aspect and thus improve physical and mental growth.
Second of all, Strict rules encourage the young generation to follow both the just and unjust laws accordingly which ultimately give them the bravery to protest against unjustice. For instances, many established laws of the government might not be fruitful enough and often there are not enough supporting rules to follow the unjust laws. Societies of the present era focus on both just and unjust laws and enable the teenagers to act accordingly. Society of present era teach the youngers to support the beggars, to protest against rape culture, to maintain equal opportunity for poor and so on. On the other hand, societies of the past often neglected them and as a result, gender-based rights, difference between poor and rich were so prominent at that time. To protest for the right thing is important to ensure a world of equal opportunities for every people and societies of present era are promoting them by their strict natures.
To conclude, experts have diverging opinions whether the rules of the present societies are too strict or not to follow and obey by the young generation. However, in my opinion, I strongly refute the idea that they are too strict to follow and strongly support their actions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-04 | saharmnd | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | Chloe4112002 | 90 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 58
- The following appeared in a letter to the city council of Canbury from the president of Plexma Motors I am pleased that the council is considering Plexma s plans to open a new manufacturing site in Canbury next year In addition to our regular line of cars 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska s North Slope a region that today experiences an extremely cold arctic climate One hundred million years ago when those dinosaurs were alive the environment of the North Slope wa 80
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks so they called the 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08673469388 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6151928519 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.523164526 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.933333333 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1333333333 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 5.45110844103 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254082142353 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915450604067 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753102677479 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17968501345 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730123080168 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.