Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is commonly held a belief that the waste from houses that is recycled is not sufficient these days, and some people mention that the sole method to increase in recycling waste is the legislation from governments. From my perspective, recycling should not be a compulsory choice but alternative choice, described in the following paragraphs.
To commence, either institutions or advertisements from the television can give information and benefits of recycling through the educational programme in order to allow people to perceive the great effective consequence from it, such as environmental aiding and even help to decrease deforestation for making papers. As a result, people will comprehend its concept and positive outcomes of recycling, and then most of them will try to change their habits for saving the surroundings for the next generation of people in the future.
Governments can also help in this concept by campaigning people to categorise the rubbish every time before they put it in the garbage can, for instance, plastic and metal. Subsequently, the government will ask volunteers for taking those organised bins to recycle in each category easily. In this case, people will not be forced by their government to recycle more, but they can still conveniently help to grow the amount of recycled waste due to the fact that everyone might not have a chance to get to the place for recycling. Therefore, this little step of organising is definitely helpful for both environment and people without the fixed law.
In conclusion, the law of recycling is not necessary since it seems to me that all citizens are capable of getting the information from the educational way, and the government can comfortably help to recycle by campaigning the method of organising the trash.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19310344828 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01262701342 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558620689655 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.679355796 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.333333333 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379027455843 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155161621387 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769589102784 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224848272281 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470618254407 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.