Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
In the argument it is stated that innoculations against cowflu cannot be permitted on outine basis since some of these innoculations have lead to mortalties of the subjects they were administered to.This conclusion seem pragamatic at first instance however an indepth analysis of the same reveals some logical fallacies that need to be cleared.
Firstly, a major lacuna in the argument is that there is no mention about the evidence in the form of studies and researches conducted to prove the mortalities' cause and percentages. At the same time other details about the dead people like their ages, presence of any comorbidities and so on are essential. For example, there is a chance that the vaccine is only proving to be detrimental to the people with a weak immune system or those who are belonging to a certain age group. In every other person, the vaccine may be completely safe and beneficial. By not administering the vaccine to these people who may not be at any risk from its innoculation, we maybe endangering their lives.
Secondly, it has been prematurely assumed that the innoculations happened to be the cause of death in all the people who died following their administration. This may not be always true as they may have been suffering from some other disease that caused their death. For instance, if a person suffering from a cardiac condition was administered the vaccine and then he died due to unrelated cause, it would be gravely wrong to blame the vaccine for death of such a patient. Thus it is imperative to carefully scrutinize the causes of death in every person who has died following an innoulation before attributing the innoculation to be the cause of death.
Finally, there is no mention about the levity that was granted to administration of the vaccine. Routine administration could mean it being administered by social workers in vaccination drives as also could mean they were provided by doctors in their clinics after examining the patients. The former could be risky however the latter seems to be a safer medium of administration and it would be unwise to curb this practice.
Considering the above points, there must be more evidence to bolster the arguments made by the author. Only then will the argument hold water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- It takes a village to raise a child The education or your children is the task of the community as a whole not merely the province of teachers and local school administrators Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 54
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 68
- CLAIM Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills REASON These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 59
- Reading paper materials is better than watching electronic devices to gain information 87
- Everyone experiences being a leader at some point in their life However not everyone is good at leading others What do you think are the qualities of a good leader 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... the subjects they were administered to.This conclusion seem pragamatic at first ins...
^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mortalities'' or 'mortality's'?
Suggestion: mortalities'; mortality's
...s and researches conducted to prove the mortalities cause and percentages. At the same time...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
... with a weak immune system or those who are belonging to a certain age group. In every other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... with a weak immune system or those who are belonging to a certain age group. In every other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he vaccine for death of such a patient. Thus it is imperative to carefully scrutiniz...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 381.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96587926509 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91380668971 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0051849904 57.8364921388 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.70786347227 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174636326085 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569016041979 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360173362484 0.0701772020484 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918064203045 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297435471623 0.0628817314937 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... the subjects they were administered to.This conclusion seem pragamatic at first ins...
^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mortalities'' or 'mortality's'?
Suggestion: mortalities'; mortality's
...s and researches conducted to prove the mortalities cause and percentages. At the same time...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb belong is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
... with a weak immune system or those who are belonging to a certain age group. In every other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... with a weak immune system or those who are belonging to a certain age group. In every other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...he vaccine for death of such a patient. Thus it is imperative to carefully scrutiniz...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 381.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96587926509 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91380668971 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 619.2 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0051849904 57.8364921388 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 119.503703932 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.70786347227 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174636326085 0.218282227539 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569016041979 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360173362484 0.0701772020484 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918064203045 0.128457276422 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297435471623 0.0628817314937 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 98.500998004 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 12.3882235529 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.