Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today’s world, overpopulation and road congestion is a major problems of almost all developing country, including Vietnam. Some people suggest that we should spend more money on railways than on road to solve this problems, but I strongly opposed this opinion because of it’s possibility.

In fact, there are 4 main factors that form the quality of the rail transportation: the condition of the infrastructure, the merit of the vehicle, the superiority of the service, and the most important thing is the control of private company, however, all of these elements are disappointed and the likelihood to solve these problems in the near future is once time in the blue moon.

First of all, it’s clear that nearly all government of developing country are still struggling with the quality of the infrastructure of the railway transportation. In fact, most of these track are mature and in many aspects, it’s insanely sluggish and dangerous, so it’s cost much time and surely, it’s not the best option for most customers. In addition, the train cannot built in the urban area, for two reason. First and foremost, clearly the train in the city will be very noisy, so it will unexpectedly create noise pollution. The next reason is the capacity for the construction. In order to construct a massive structure as a train route in the city, they need to clear variety of building, which cost an amount of money. And the final reason is if you build a train ways in the city, it will directly compete with traditional bus, which is an poor idea. Moreover, near those gas stations, it’s lack of fundamental service, such as big supermarket or the wait room, so it’s akward for both foreign and domestic travellers. For all of those reason, I think hardly no investors will be ready to risk a lot of money to fix the remaining problems.

The second reason that prevent investors from renewing the railways is the age of vehicles, which is a major obstacles. In the comparison to developed country such as Japan, China or Russia, their’s train was insanely speedy, about 10 times faster than most of train in Vietnam. Indeed, because the train of Vietnam was nearly at the end of its lifetime, it’s very noisy and vibration, which effect hardly to my experience on that journey. On the other side, the trains in Japan are quiet and peaceful in it’s cabin, so the trip will be so relax and comfortable. In dead, to develop such an excellent train as Japan or China, it costs a lot of both time and money, and I believe that not many investors were patient enough to cycle back their funds. For those reasons, the train in Vietnam will be guests picky, and of course, no investors will be interested in this construct anymore because of its price.

The third obstacles that every investor had to thinking about is the quality of the service on the train. It’s cant be disposed that the standard of service on the train has been boosted magically for the past 20 years, but still, it’s still not enough if you compared to the service economy seat or the business class at the same prices. In order to enhance the service on the train, for sure, it will cost such a long time, money and even humans. Clearly, no body will risk such an amount of money for that risky business.

The last obstacle, and the biggest one, is the control of railway business of the government. If the train system was fully operated on the state budget exclusively, there will be no rivalry between the private firm and the government, which will anticipate the thrive of the train industry. In deed, it will be such a waste if we cease the movement of railway industry, especially it’s a billion commerce. The question is, who will dare to compensate millions to get profits after 50, or even 100 years?

In conclusion, the development of the train is still not sturdy enough to convince the investors to join in this billions business. In my opinion, government should spends money on roads more than on railways because of its potentiality.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-26 Huyenlbg87 11 view
2024-11-24 hahoaan 78 view
2024-11-21 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-11-20 Giang Tran 84 view
Essays by user Cao Quân Bảo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...pulation and road congestion is a major problems of almost all developing country, inclu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...money on railways than on road to solve this problems, but I strongly opposed this o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ABOUT_ITS_NN[25]
Message: Did you mean 'of its possibility'?
Suggestion: of its possibility
...I strongly opposed this opinion because of it’s possibility. In fact, there are 4 main factors ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s opinion because of it’s possibility. In fact, there are 4 main factors that f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... future is once time in the blue moon. First of all, it’s clear that nearly all...
^^^
Line 5, column 850, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... compete with traditional bus, which is an poor idea. Moreover, near those gas sta...
^^
Line 5, column 1059, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: hardly think
... travellers. For all of those reason, I think hardly no investors will be ready to risk a lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f money to fix the remaining problems. The second reason that prevent investors...
^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'obstacle'?
Suggestion: obstacle
...s the age of vehicles, which is a major obstacles. In the comparison to developed country...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: YOUR_S[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their' or 'theirs'?
Suggestion: their; theirs
...country such as Japan, China or Russia, their’s train was insanely speedy, about 10 tim...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'effect'.
Suggestion: hardly effect
...e, it’s very noisy and vibration, which effect hardly to my experience on that journey. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 506, Rule ID: IT_IS[18]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...ains in Japan are quiet and peaceful in it’s cabin, so the trip will be so relax and...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onstruct anymore because of its price. The third obstacles that every investor ...
^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ality of the service on the train. It’s cant be disposed that the standard of servic...
^^^^
Line 9, column 459, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'nobody'?
Suggestion: nobody
...g time, money and even humans. Clearly, no body will risk such an amount of money for t...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ount of money for that risky business. The last obstacle, and the biggest one, ...
^^^
Line 11, column 259, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d the government, which will anticipate the thrive of the train industry. In deed, it will...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profits after 50, or even 100 years? In conclusion, the development of the tr...
^^^
Line 13, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...iness. In my opinion, government should spends money on roads more than on railways be...
^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... railways because of its potentiality.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, of course, such as, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 41.998997996 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3357.0 1615.20841683 208% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 702.0 315.596192385 222% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.14735685561 4.20363070211 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63180522276 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 329.0 176.041082164 187% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468660968661 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1015.2 506.74238477 200% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.76152304609 315% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3854811492 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.892857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 20.0 5.01903807615 398% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119313335897 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404396531811 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837589236001 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893454303714 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961703037745 0.056905535591 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 78.4519038076 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.