Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Providing Internet access is just as important as other services, such as building roads, so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost.
Planning services rationally is one of the crucial responsibilities for governments. Personally, I do not feel that governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost. I feel this way in two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the Internet services need money to maintain the services. If governments provide Internet services for free, they need to reduce funding for other services for the Internet
maintenance. For instance, if governments reduce money for transportation services like building more subway stations or planning new bus routes, this may lead inconveniences to citizens in some areas. Moreover, if governments reduce funding for building roads, this may cause more traffic jams or accidents. In addition, if the money for supporting public services is used for providing Internet. As a result, some public buildings like libraries or post offices, they will have less money to hire enough employees to serve citizens. Citizens may feel disappointed with governments because of bad experiences. Accordingly, it is not valuable for governments to offer free Internet services since other services like building and roads are more necessary than Internet.
Secondly, it is wasteful for governments to offer Internet access to all of their citizens. Generally, most people nowadays are using Internet every day, but there are also some citizens like old people who do not use Internet. Take my grandparents as an example, last year, I decided to teach my grandparents to use smart phones to send messages or read news online. Therefore, I helped open and install the Internet service in their apartment. However, when I was teaching them how to use the smart phone, they were really uninterested in learning about this. At the same time, my grandfather told me that he felt uncomfortable with looking at the screen of the smart phone. Finally, I realized that smart phones and Internet services were not necessary in their lifes. Thus, I closed their apartment's Internet service and played with them in other ways that they felt more enjoyable.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is not a good idea that governments provide Internet services for all of their citizens for free. This is because the maintenance of the Internet services will make government to reduce the money to other more important services, and also because it is wasteful for people who do not need this service.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Hossein2000 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
- fsdfsd 56
- Universities should spend more money on improving facilities like library computer labs than on hiring famous teachers 70
- Universities should spend more money on improving facilities like library computer labs than on hiring famous teachers 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding for other services for the Internet maintenance. For instance, if government...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1925 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88864046742 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5275116161 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.45110844103 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364543339788 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132249454093 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115193495952 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237052605078 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045803325315 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.