Some people feel that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative impact than positive Do you agree

Essay topics:

Some people feel that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative impact than positive. Do you agree

Submitted by auds on Mon, 08/10/2020 - 08:38

Helping others is a way of expressing our humanity. Many people hold the opinion that helping underdeveloped counties has numerous terrible effects than positive. This essay will disagree with this statement before a conclusion is evolved.

Succoring needy countries result in many benefits. Helping underdeveloped countries like Africa can increase the economic conditions in their own country. For instance, every country is rich in some aspects such as Africa provides one of the best-graded diamonds in the world, on the other they lack good facilities in health care systems. So, countries like Australia and New Zealand are aiding them by providing good doctors and medical equipment. As a result, Africa is giving their resources to Australia and New Zealand with low taxes in which they can gain a rise in their economy. Eventually, both countries have benefits without any ill effects.

Aiding impoverished countries not only has economic benefits, but it can also raise the employment rate in that particular country. To cite an example, developed countries like the United States of America invested money in some developing countries like India to help the country economically. Therefore, Americans can employ more people from their nation to India by undertaking some companies there, which increases the employment rate of America. So, rich countries should come forward to aid the needy ones, which as mutual benefits.

To sum up, this essay disagreed that, helping poor nations has no negative effects in which they can make a profit by developing their economy and employment rate. Hence, developed countries should pay attention to the underdeveloped ones, which has the the advantage to both countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-10 auds 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by user auds :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment before a conclusion is evolved. Succoring needy countries result in many...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve benefits without any ill effects. Aiding impoverished countries not only h...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eedy ones, which as mutual benefits. To sum up, this essay disagreed that, he...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n to the underdeveloped ones, which has the the advantage to both countries.
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 251, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n to the underdeveloped ones, which has the the advantage to both countries.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47407407407 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8080327653 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7981481061 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163776259393 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546572320587 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315863215386 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902386361599 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048711802079 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment before a conclusion is evolved. Succoring needy countries result in many...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve benefits without any ill effects. Aiding impoverished countries not only h...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eedy ones, which as mutual benefits. To sum up, this essay disagreed that, he...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...n to the underdeveloped ones, which has the the advantage to both countries.
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 251, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...n to the underdeveloped ones, which has the the advantage to both countries.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47407407407 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8080327653 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7981481061 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163776259393 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546572320587 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315863215386 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902386361599 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048711802079 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.