The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates top ten nations of the world leading in electricity production and consumption for the year 2014. Measurement unit is KWh.
Overall, all the countries are producing more electricity than they are consuming only except Germany. China and the USA are at the top of the charts and their electricity consumption and production is way more than the other countries (almost 4 to 5 times) whereas rest of the countries in the top ten list have almost same consumption and production.
China is on the top of the list with almost 5400 billion Kwh units of production as well as consumption, USA is also not far behind having produced and consumed nearly 4000 billion Kwh in 2014 which is 4 times the next contender in the list i.e. Russia. Russia is closely followed by Japan and India who have almost same electricity needs (around 900 billion Kwh).
Nations that form up the bottom half of the list are Canada, France, Brazil, Germany and Korea, Rep. and they all are having nearly same demand of electricity which is close to 500 billion Kwh.
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 49
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Nowadays many people believe that children should be taught history in schools however others argue that children should learn subjects that are more helpful for modern everyday life Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The table below shows top ten countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75675675676 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58249430675 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2082072445 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203780466722 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107785953427 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120713957895 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14908452149 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115218020914 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.