In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation

Having a private house to live could be an essential part of life in some countries, whether in other countries people live in rental houses appropriately. There are some reasons for this matter related to economic condition of a society as well as the safeness of a land. In the following essay I would discuss them to reveal my opinion on this topic.
In the first place, in some nations the policy-makers believe in fresh models on developments. These regimes tend to change their decisions in short-times. In this kind of countries people prefer to use facilities, like a house, in a sustainable way rather than using them temporarily because they want to be ensure about the foreseeable future. The more rapid changes in a society, the more people attempt to gain stability, according to sociologists.
At the second stage, citizens of a great majority of developing countries need to have a comfort zone as they might confront with various crisis in their life-time. Living in a rental house in some societies could be a sign of unsafety and risk. Thus, people who own their shelter could feel more confident and confort in times of trouble. Take Syria where have been faced with civil war as an example; having a very little home could provide more convenient life for citizens than living years in a rental luxuries house.
In conclusion, owning or renting a place to live can be two suitable options depend on various circumstances, nevertheless, I want to suggest that being the owner of a home should be more beneficial in a long-term.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 229, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...prefer to use facilities, like a house, in a sustainable way rather than using them temporarily beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... of a home should be more beneficial in a long-term.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in short, kind of, as well as, in the first place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85660377358 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81506398891 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6438302585 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230078920492 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073156807121 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442504005723 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133430061887 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019074886853 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.