Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that reading has more positive impacts on the abilities of offspring than watching TV or playing video games. While I accept that reading is essential for the development of a child, I believe that utilize digital devices also plays an equally important role in the life of a child.
On the one hand, reading is indispensable for a child. Due to the massive amount of knowledge contained in a book, reading can improve the capability of imagination and linguistic skills. For example, fairy tales usually have meaningful and fantastical stories, which would enhance creativity of a child. Beside, through reading these stories, children could be better understand of grammatical and lexical utilization. Therefore, they can be more confident when they study at school. Additionally, reading requires the comprehension of the concept and the context. Achieving this would dramatically enhance the intelligence and cognition of a child.
On the other hand, I believe watching TV or playing video games could bring the same or even better benefits for offspring. The first reason, similar to reading, watching TV and playing games could improve the ability of creativity and linguistic skills. For example, decision-based video games, which is the type of games tailored by how you play, require gamers know their circumstances and have to choose the right solution. By playing these games, therefore children would learn from experience every time they choose the wrong solution. Another reason is by watching channels about tourism, children could know more about their country and foreign countries. Books are only able to provide some images about a country in comparison with tourism channels could provides more detail and specific images about a country. Thus, children can imagine about their world they are living in.
In conclusion, while I accept that reading is vital for a child, I believe watching TV or playing computer games could be equally important.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read news in the newspaper and watch news programs on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 765, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... comparison with tourism channels could provides more detail and specific images about a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29841269841 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78169519687 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9620654533 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1764705882 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298274283209 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949812776948 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758179750661 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198605400552 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567570475279 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.