Some people say music promotes children learning. However, there are mixed results on impact of music generated from researches. To what extent do you agree or disagree that: music has impacts on humans' life?
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people say music promotes children learning; However, there are mixed results on the impact of music generated from research" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that promoting children learning might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that music can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, the impacts of music on humans' life can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that improving learning processes and the effects of music on children learning are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the roles of music in education. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both learning music and the academical music distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the lack of music in humans' life might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of mental diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of emotions can relate to the reality that the demerits of the absence of music can pertain to the role of governments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of mixed results were correlated positively with the classical music, the local authorities would ultimately address the impacts of music on students' self-esteem. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of music as a treatment.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of impacts of music on humans' life far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-19 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-01 | Gohar Khan | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-31 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-28 | Ahmed145 | 61 | view |
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music or film in whichever way they wish There should be no government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Nowadays more and more people engage in dangerous activities such as sky diving and motorcycling Are you in favour of them Use examples to support your opinion 88
- Talk about an invention that you think beneficial or harmful 88
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today s digitalized world Explain what is it and the cause of it How do you define lazy journalism and what is the cause 88
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ion standpoint, the impacts of music on humans life can provide the society with profo...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... that the merits of impacts of music on humans life far outweigh its downsides.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56949152542 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14373473497 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0907780978 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480077290997 0.242375264174 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169735852432 0.0925447433944 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107576900274 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278579625351 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702520806976 0.0609392437508 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.