Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that verbal communication is significantly effective than the written one. I partially agree with this viewpoint as communicating though the writing could be more suitable to some degree.
On the one hand, spoken communication would be better in some situations which require facial expressions and body language. When dating, for instance, people must express their feelings to attract others. Face-to-face contact would be more emotional and interesting, compared to sending messages to each other, which is much more boring since all they could see is just the phone screens. Besides, expressing the feelings by face is much better than emotion icons on the smartphone. Furthermore, seeing people’s expressions could help to guess the true feelings of others through smiling, crying or even doing nothing. Because there is little likelihood that people could lie through their eyes. With written communication, people could hardly know whether others tell the truths or not.
On the other hand, in some circumstances, written words could be more effective. In business, written documents such as contracts or commitments would ensure that people have to do exactly as they compromised in those papers. For example, in a contract, employers say that the employees’ salaries can rise by 3.5% in a year, and if they break the contract, workers would have the rights to sue the companies. Additionally, when contacting the clients, people could send emails to them instead of talking to each individual, making it more productive and less time-consuming.
In conclusion, some people would prefer face-to-face conversations with written communication. I believe that whether to choose spoken words or written ones would depend on certain situations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... smiling, crying or even doing nothing. Because there is little likelihood that people ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49084249084 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02362259613 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600732600733 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.270833094 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175737446668 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659478878324 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617410420734 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131466595034 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815123607423 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.