Air pollution caused by traffic has become a major issue in most developed countries. Although the car industry has undergone deep technological improvements, exhaust emissions represent still a letal threath to the environment. Scientific research carried out throughout the past decades, have given extra weight to this delicate issue. As a possible solution to curb the level of pollution, it has been proposed to reduce the usage of car to travel form home to work or go shopping. To some extent I am agree with this view, although I would suggest more aggressive steps to tackle the problem.
Given that the government cannot force people to give up using a car and cannot impose how many miles citizens are allowed to cover by car, the idea although theoretically right, is practically impossible to realize. Another approach should therefore be followed, which is surely easier to establish: subsidizing the public transport.
By improving and making more efficient the net of public transport, like buses, underground and encouraging people to take advantage of those means, traffic jams and the related air pollution will automatically decrease. Additional benefits -that can pass unnoticed at first but have a major impact on the everyday life - occur to the people who choose to ride public tranportation: they do not have to waste time looking for a free park lot, they do not have to spend money on gasoline and they can enjoy the trip to work and back home reading or listening to the music. According to several researcher public transportatio can ease the traffic congestion, reduce harmful carbon-dioxide emissions by cars, reduce the individual´s carbon footprint and provide an affordable alternative to driving. It is not only good for the environment, it also a good for the wallet. According to the American Public Transport Associations , households that use public transporttion save an average of 6000 Dollars every year
To sum up, I think that rather than taking actions against drivers, officials should find alternatives ways like funding public transportation, which would have a positive impact not only on the environment but on the whole economy as well.
- It is often argued that children must be protected from unsuitable material on tv and internet by government censorship Others say that it is the parents responsibility to control what their children do and watch To what extent do you think that this is 89
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The role of education is to prepare children for the modern world Schools should cut art and music out of the curriculum so that children can focus on useful subjects such as information technology To what extent do you agree 56
- Some people think that e books are the death of paper books while others think that paper books will never disappear Discuss both sides and give your opinion 95
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 352 350
No. of Characters: 1796 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.331 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.102 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.88 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.887 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.385 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.542 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.024 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5