Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today’s progressive and sophisticated world, working allocate quite a few time of human beings hours during day, people are preoccupying different type of jobs timing schedule. There is a heated debate, in which some people prefer to work fewer days with longer hour, thereby they have more time for their other task, in the other side, others prefer to have job, in which they work five days for shorter hours. Personally speaking, my inclination is working for three days on a week for long hours. In what follows, I firmly support my ideas.
It is well established fact that, working plays a significant role in human beings quality of life. in today’s hustle and bustle of life there is a lot of competitions for purchasing well-payed and decent jobs. There are jobs with various conditions which each of them have its special merits and demerits, in some of them employees are required to work fewer day in a week but more hours. More flexible schedules are accessible for the worker in this kind of job. By attending in second job, which advocated their other days, they can purchase some specific part time job and more money. Working three days on a week is a good choice for student since they can accomplish their assignments on other days and do their project in this way they can have pleasant saving to pay their tuition fee or state of the art equipment for their project which working for five days for shorter work do not give them this option.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that working is first step of being independent from family mentally and monetary, ones can do what they want and pay attention to their interest by earning monthly bill. Job with lesser day during the week give them this chance to do their interest professionally, thereby they can strive to nurture and flourish their talent. On the other side, gradually working during the week do not give them this opportunity. Form point of my personal experience, I with mu close friend worked as a quality control specialist in the factory which manufactured aerosol cans in three days on a week and we should check the health of cans during flanging on the production line just for three days for 12 hours in two section of work. My friend went to violin class in the other days of the week so she follows her dreams in half of the week and know she plays in orchestra with professional musicians. If she worked for five days during the week, she was tired at the rest of the day and she would not play as professionally as need for this big achievements.
In sum, considering aforementioned reasons. Jobs with three days in a week is better than job with five days due to several reasons such as participating in part time job and allocating more time to one’s interest and talent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- summaries the points made in the lecture 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 73
- TPO41 Q1 80
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'few times'.
Suggestion: few times
...ticated world, working allocate quite a few time of human beings hours during day, peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...world, working allocate quite a few time of human beings hours during day, people...
^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...n the other side, others prefer to have job, in which they work five days for short...
^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...t role in human beings quality of life. in today’s hustle and bustle of life there...
^^
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...r days, they can purchase some specific part time job and more money. Working three days ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 798, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...sant saving to pay their tuition fee or state of the art equipment for their project which worki...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 774, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'section' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'sections'.
Suggestion: sections
...just for three days for 12 hours in two section of work. My friend went to violin class...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...lows her dreams in half of the week and know she plays in orchestra with professiona...
^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...everal reasons such as participating in part time job and allocating more time to one’s i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, well, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52083795592 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6288651987 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.888888889 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399736228372 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138022827073 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087122388935 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284533624467 0.150856017488 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344712468715 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.