A live performance vs. television broadcast
According to technological instruments, people today have a variety of options for their leisure time. They have lots of entertainment choices such as take attend concerts, visit museums, and so on. One of the most popular ones is artistic and sports events. Some people believe that nothing can replace by live performance. Others stand on the other side, believing that television broadcast is merit supplant, especially for people who are too busy to attend these kinds of events. Personally speaking, I agree with the second group. I will explain my points of view in the following essay.
In the first place, I think attending to art or sports events are time-consuming. For example, for a ninety minutes soccer match, you should allocate at least four hours. It is an approximate time for only attend the main event and does not include the after-party or something like that. It can be even more for art performances. While you can seat on your sofa in front of the TV, and enjoy your favorite performance in less time. Owed to the satellite antenna, television broadcast coverage all the events around the world. So you will not miss any important event.
In the second place, according to the television broadcast, you have not location restriction anymore. You can receive the signal of your favorite program even from the far-long places. But if you want to watch the live version of a performance, you have to adjust your personal or work plan to them. It does not seem meaningful for people who have a serious job and career. I think live performances are suitable for local performers in local places. For example, university sports or art events are very popular and students from that university can attend without bothering themselves for distance and unavailability. But attending to the other events do not reasonable.
In the third place, when we watch our favorable performance in front of the TV, we can do other things, too. we can do our assignments, cook, check our email, etc. But when we attend a live performance we have to allocate all our time only at that event. Nou doubt, for a serious fandom, nothing can replace with the live performance and the experiment of the excitement cannot be compared with the television broadcast. But for a busy person who just wants to have several funny moments, television broadcast is a very good supplant.
All in all, in my opinion, the television broadcast's advantages overweight the disadvantages and I prefer to enjoy that to be aware of most of the events. I have explained my reasons in the above paragraph. Here I want just to mention that I really love the excitement and good feeling of the live performance but is not my priority in my life and I prefer to benefit from the television broadcast.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-02 | Stiliyan94 | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-28 | Akshatagh | 60 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | Michael Shedrack | 76 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 93 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | AMARDEEP KOUR GEDHU | 70 | view |
- the government should spend money on sport or art 73
- What are the qualities of the good neighbors 60
- Should university students be required to attend classes 76
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 50
- face to face communication of email and phone call 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...of the TV, we can do other things, too. we can do our assignments, cook, check our...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, really, second, so, third, while, at least, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion, in the first place, in the second place, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84842105263 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8092052878 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475789473684 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 733.5 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0857879103 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4137931034 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3793103448 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68965517241 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243971312765 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643941343989 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855221546561 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157021743172 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692666735578 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.