It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science subjects. What are the causes? And what will be effected on society?
In many a nation, the number of aspirants who wish to study science subjects decreases. While the major causes for this situation are the complexity of these subjects and the attraction of youngsters towards creative fields such as arts and finance, this trend has brought in more job opportunities and improved living standards for people. In this essay, both will be discussed in detail.
The major factors that lead to low interest levels for science subjects are the complex contents of it, and rush of younger minds to interesting platforms like arts and economics. With the advent of new technological innovations, the science stream seems to get filled with more sophisticated additions that demands higher Intelligence Quotient (IQ), for which the present learners are doubtful themselves. Coding, for instance, if not trained properly from elementary sessions, that would be difficult for any student to understand. Again it depends on skill levels too. Apart from that, flourishing of other fields like commerce, finance and creative arts also has pulled the students from joining traditionally accepted science courses. From a student's point of view, these areas of study appear to give less headache, but lucrative career unlike the bygone days.
The selective learning trend has a very positive effect on society. This has created more job opportunities and improved the lifestyle of people. As the industries have started to explore the business possibilities of these non-science streams, young people could find employment of their choice and start organizations. Amazon, the world's biggest e-commerce platform seems to be the best example in such cases. Moreover, when the citizens could find earnings easily, the living standards have gone up, and the entire community appears to be progressive. Perhaps, this could bring financial equality among people and put a full stop to intolerance and violence.
In conclusion, the increased admissions to non-science streams seem to be because of the subject complexity and entry of new possibilities in other subjects. Society has benefitted out of this by gaining a better life for its members. It is hoped that such changes would soon bring the whole world under one shade.
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 89
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are the causes And what will be effected on society 89
- An organization has given an advertisement for a part time volunteer job for local children Write a letter to the administrator of the organization In your letter Introduce yourself Why you think you are suitable for this job State when you will be able t
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the biggest'.
Suggestion: worlds the biggest
...ce and start organizations. Amazon, the worlds biggest e-commerce platform seems to be the bes...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36260623229 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82701663386 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606232294618 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2818820713 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6111111111 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162374466965 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475907187901 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431725087775 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967447543507 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351231514475 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.