Agree or disagree. It is more important to use the land for human needs like farms, houses, and factories than for saving endangered animals.
The land for the public is essential in order to fulfill the needs of many individuals that are in need of food, money, and many other things. Although many people believe that land is more important for protecting wild animals, while I strongly believe that the land is more important for public needs. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the land is an important factor for farmers, which brings food and money to their families. Farmers can fulfill their basic necessities by growing crops on the land. Consequently, they can feed their families without asking others for assistance. To be more specific, around two decades ago, my ancestors lived in a village. They had spent their entire life in farming and serving their family. One day, a huge drought wreaked havoc and destroyed their whole farming land. Due to which, they could not grow any crops for six months. Needless to say, they were in a big problem in those six months. Thus, they could not feed their families because of food shortages. Hence, it shows that the land for human needs is really important for some individuals.
Also, using human land is essential because it is a place where one can easily sleep on without any fear. Moreover, it is a place where one can live with their loved ones. A typical example of this would be homeless people. There are thousands of homeless people in Los Angeles. They lived in tents. where they did not have any safety. As a result, the mayor of LA decided to build a separate building for homeless people so that they can live comfortably with their families, and they do not have to worry about harsh weather. As you can see, the land is a blessing for many of the individuals.
In a nutshell, it is beneficial to use the land for public needs. This is because farmers can serve their families and also homeless people can live with their loved ones under one roof without any fear of harsh climate and insecurity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...eir families. Farmers can fulfill their basic necessities by growing crops on the land. Consequen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Where
...le in Los Angeles. They lived in tents. where they did not have any safety. As a resu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le in Los Angeles. They lived in tents. where they did not have any safety. As a resu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, while, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66855524079 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36706530926 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495750708215 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6871052581 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.652173913 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.347826087 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232608184203 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776251044614 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901244038776 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155642316104 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760557725023 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.21 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.