The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished. The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table compares how many visitors come to the Ashdown museum in two consecutive years, after and before refurbishment, and also the pie chart shows the outline of survey about people's ideas for these redecorations.
As can be noted from the table, the number of visitors after the change of museum decorations was increased from 74,000 to 92,000. This shows the museum get succeed to more attract individuals. However, the number of visitors is not sufficient to understand how much satisfaction is received.
The survey is complementary to more verification of the result of the table. In any way, the outlines of surveys completely confirm the previous results.
For example, after refurbishment, the number of very satisfied people was above two-fold that of the year before refurbishment, 35 compared to 15, and in the case of very unsatisfied visitors, the people's ideas are completely changed and decreased from 35 to 15.
All in all, a lot of visitors considered these changes to be positive whereas there is still some critics about these changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Behnaz.babayani | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | baokhanh | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | abishek_dhakal | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Alternative energy sources that use the natural power of the wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, whereas, as for, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15606936416 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96348634688 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5304329543 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280028256313 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106486267058 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676052349617 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134204361672 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082047138203 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.