Feedback and evaluation are necessary aspects of school and work, but many people dislike being evaluated.
What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved?
In order for an organisation to work efficiently and provide suitable results, they need to know their areas of improvement. So, it has become quite necessary for an organisation to evaluate each and every aspect of it, whether it be human or non-human aspect. But there is a sense of aversion towards these feedbacks and evaluation. Let's take a look at some of the reasons behind it.
In most of the organisation, the evaluation metrics does not take into consideration the restrictions placed by it on the person. Consider the instance of an employee in the lowermost layer in the company. The company has placed overarching restictions on his workflow and is allowed to do mundane tasks a certain way. Now, if you evaluate this employee on the parameter of creativity, he will be on the lower spectrum. And that is as unfair as evaluating how much fast can a tortoise go on the land.
And coming on to the parameters, the feedback and evaluations still uses some of the outdated or plagarised parameters to evaluate an employee. Consider that a form is released by several colleges to collect feedback about classes from their students. There is a highly likely chance that these universities will have almost the same questions, or maybe even the same form with different headers.
And lastly, in an organisation, there is a highly likely chance that these feedback forms will be full of personal bias. Consider an earnest employee in an organisation who is praised by most of the people. There is a likely chance that some of the people dislike that person due to jealousy. Now, if they are asked their feedback about that person, they are likely to inundate it with a negative response rather than a neutral or a positive one.
Above reasons are likely root causes of people's aversion towards feedback and evaluation. In order to curb this problem, the organisation need to make sure to update the parameters of a feedback so that it can keep up with their culture. Also, they need to keep in mind the bounds placed of a person. Finally, it must be made sure that each and every feedback must be free from personal bias.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-24 | dangerclose | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | JAY9923 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-12 | oanhnghuyen | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-12 | oanhnghuyen | 61 | view |
| 2020-12-12 | oanhnghuyen | 84 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The following appeared as part of the Dean’s newsletter:"The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students. We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well-rounded 63
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our students 50
- Recent incursions by deep sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population With the breeding season fast approaching the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase Nonetheless the po 55
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...towards these feedbacks and evaluation. Lets take a look at some of the reasons behi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cks and evaluation. Lets take a look at some of the reasons behind it. In most of the or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the feedback and evaluations still uses some of the outdated or plagarised parameters to ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e people. There is a likely chance that some of the people dislike that person due to jealo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, lastly, look, may, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78108108108 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75169248668 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494594594595 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9270362716 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.45 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247397289937 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678572678178 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635041463913 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131563524091 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346098654797 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.