The chart below give information on the age of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts reveal the change in the proportion of the populations with three different groups of age of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Overall, in 2000, while the figure for group 1 (0-14 years) accounted for the biggest point in Yemen, the same figure in Italy was seen decrease quite considerably. After 50 years, both Yemen and Italy, the percentages of group 2(15-59 years) remain ahead of the others.
In 2000, the percentage of group 1 in Yemen was the biggest rise, at over 1 in every 5. The opposite was true for Italy that the rate of people owned 15-59 years was higher than for the remaining two groups, at 61.6 percent. While the percentage of the populations in group 3 (60+ years) in Italy made up 24.1 percent, the same figure in Yemen experienced small point, which lower 8 times than that in Italy.
In 2050, the proportion of people in group 2 of Yemen witness an upward trend, growing approximately 11 percent. By contrast, the rate of group 2 in Italy decrease slightly, from 61.6 percent to 46.2 percent. People were 60+ years of Yemen is still the lowest rate, just 5.7 percent while the rate of the same age in Italy see a significant increase at 42.3 percent.
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems 73
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58064516129 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44771180561 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9749130058 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172048700662 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888269741896 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753926708178 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143118419412 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860081410497 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.