Human presence on Venus
The reading passage states that maintaining a permanent human presence on Mars and Moon in more possible than maintaining it on Venus. The writer of the passage provides some reasons to support this point of view. However, the lecturer suggested that humans can create a station 50 km above Venus' surface instead of establishing a permanent station on Venus' surface. By doing so, the problems discussed by the passage are solved.
First, the reading passage claims that the atmospheric pressure in the Venus can damage spacecraft which wants to land on the Venus' surface. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that when the station is located 50 km above the surface, the atmospheric pressure is the same as the pressure on the Earth's surface.
Furthermore, the author asserts that in Venus' surface and its atmosphere there are not any water and oxygen. So, these vital substances should be transported from Earth which is impossible. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid which are abundant in Venus atmosphere can be used to produce water and oxygen. Therefore, there is no need to be supplied these materials to Venus.
Finally, the reading passage believes that thick clouds and dense layers of carbon dioxide prevent sunlight to reach Venus' surface. Thus, humans cannot produce electricity for their machines and equipment. The reading, on the other hand, makes the argument that the station above the Venus' surface can get more sunlight because the cloud thick is not very thick in that elevation. In addition, reflected light from the clouds can be used to produce more electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | YasamanEsml | 65 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | reza_fattahi | 76 | view |
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 73
- Human presence on Venus 75
- Elephants 66
- Sending humans to Mars 3
- The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines However the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all First the writer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, in addition, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10989010989 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59206107353 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505494505495 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8164092137 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28517882947 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922674309917 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947185044385 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163388119988 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901457464475 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.