The pie charts show information about the age of visitors who went to Spain from UK in 1983 and in 2003.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of different age groups of resident who visited from UK to Spain in 1983 and in 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of age group 36-55 years old people visited more to Spain from UK than the other age groups in both 1983 and 2003 years.
According to the pie charts, there was a dramatic increase in the percentage of age group 16-24 years old resident who visited Spain form UK from 4 % to 13% between 1993 and 2003,a rise of 9% in 10 years.Howeve, in the percentage of age group 0-15 years old people who travelled Spain from UK increased a little around 1% from 1983 to 2003.
On the other hand,a large amount of people visited Spain from UK of age group 36-55 years old in 1983 while the percentage shank in 2003.The figures were 50% and 43% respectively. 24% of people age group 25-35 years old visited to Spain in 1983 which was almost double than the age group 25-35 years old visited in the same year.However,the same proportion of age group 0-15 and 25-35 years old people visited to Spain from UK in 2003.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-03 | Rayhan3268 | 76 | view |
- The tables below show the information on teenagers who smoked in Europe in three years of 1980 to 1988 and 1998 67
- The pie charts show information about the age of visitors who went to Spain from UK in 1983 and in 2003 76
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise this information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 100
- Solving environmental problems should be responsibility of International organisation insted of each national government Do you agree or disagree 84
- The first pie chart shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second pie chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Howeve
... 1993 and 2003,a rise of 9% in 10 years.Howeve, in the percentage of age group 0-15 ye...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
... from 1983 to 2003. On the other hand,a large amount of people visited Spain fr...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...1983 while the percentage shank in 2003.The figures were 50% and 43% respectively. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...5-35 years old visited in the same year.However,the same proportion of age group 0-15 a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ars old visited in the same year.However,the same proportion of age group 0-15 and 2...
^^^^
Line 7, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople visited to Spain from UK in 2003.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48223350254 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41363948123 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416243654822 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1824126685 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.6 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325743015264 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264803614892 0.103423049105 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109973018985 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293447505304 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104597354975 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 16.0 40.7170731707 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.