The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart shows a general comparison of average changes of housing prices among five different cities in two periods in contrast with 1989. It’s clear presented that 2 of these cities such as New York and London have a completely opposite trend in the housing price changing. Meanwhile, the other three cities, Madrid, Tokyo and Frankfurt, are experiencing a drop in the housing price compared with 1989.
To be more specific, London has the largest gap in terms of differences of housing price percentage changes between these 2 periods, up to almost 20%, while New York’s housing price change is slightly smaller as 10%. However, other cities show a different movement in housing price. Madrid and Tokyo’s housing price move in the same direction. In detail, housing price in Madrid increased around 4% based on 1989, whereas Tokyo’s price dropped more than 5%. Furthermore, fluctuations of Frankfurt’s housing price are extremely slight and the price can be considered to be unchanged.
In a conclusion, the chart indicates housing price is different cities went through a completely different movement in two same periods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-07 | Atefeh 1248 | 61 | view |
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money others argue that it is better to improve and try such situations discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The pie charts below show units o f electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds o f meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in jive different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Countries are becoming more and more sim ilar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ousing price change is slightly smaller as 10%. However, other cities show a diffe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, whereas, while, as to, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29120879121 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76838575107 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1906482791 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406686750729 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204460219384 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808777350793 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294318444548 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730076002729 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.