Nowadays environmental problems are too big for individual countries or people to solve. We have reached the stage where we need cooperation on an international level to protect the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The discussion heats about whether individual countries or international cooperation is mandatory to resolve environmental issues. I firmly agree that the extent of environmental issues is extremely big to alleviate individually and the countries or people should cooperate on a global level so as to save the nature.
The international cooperation is a preferred option under some circumstances. First and foremost, the scale of the disaster makes it difficult for an individual nation; no matter it is a developed country or developing nation, to settle complicated environmental issues. Bush fires in Australia, for example, which almost destroyed half of the Australian forests and a quarter of Koala species, was not possible to tackle without the collaboration of neighbouring countries. Secondly, the international alignment has a financial advantage to develop cutting-edge technologies to address these ecological problems, which would obviously increase financial pressure for a country itself, especially, for a third-world country.
Global environmental problems require different countries to collaborate with. Certain issues, such as climate change, depletion of the ozone layer, global warming and extinction of some animal species, are unlikely to be solved without international cooperation. Kyoto Protocol Agreement, for example, establishes a standard internationally to require different countries to reduce their greenhouse emissions. In this case, a single nation's effort is much less significant than a group contribution. It is undeniable the participation of individuals and local authorities is crucial. In the case of environmental conditions, such as waste pollution, noise pollution and deforestation, in particular regions, certain governmental policies work much better than international laws. However, in a global term, without the involvement of global organizations, some local governments show reluctance to deal with those issues.
To conclude the whole discussion, I would like to re-assert that international cooperation is crucial in most situations. Therefore, in order to solve most of the environmental problems, global and local ecological issues, cooperation with international organizations and other countries, I believe, is more practical and advantageous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-28 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | Rustam Asrorov | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | Rustam Asrorov | 95 | view |
- In contemporary society food has become easier to prepare Drawing on specific reasons and examples do you think this has had an impact on the way people live 67
- Some people believe that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people feel that boarding schools where students or pupils live at the school during the term are an excellent opinion for children while other people disagree for a number of reasons Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion 84
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent many people believe that other measures will be needed Discuss both sides 89
- Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots What is your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ople should cooperate on a global level so as to save the nature. The international co...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...house emissions. In this case, a single nations effort is much less significant than a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, as to, for example, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09202453988 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56567351649 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4101946157 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21646939303 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743547190445 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597745058248 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144902955438 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711108655169 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.04 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.