Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Cars help us move from one place to the other, easier and more private than any other transportation choice. In the contemporary world, using cars is exaggerated and causes immense problems for the surrounding environment. Though some people believe that using cars will grow in the upcoming years, I believe that utilizing cars will diminish in twenty years from now.
First of all, increasing the development of technology leads to more efficient public transportation and it is not hard to imagine a day in which vast groups of people move from one point to the other, just by using the modern technology invented to convey this population. Development in technology can also lead to more localized activities, such as working online or finding jobs or other activities that implement movement in our peripheral area. For instance, freelancer jobs reached their peak in the 2020 outbreak of coronavirus, when social distancing inhibited people from going out. In twenty years, it is foreseeable that the online world permits people from working from their homes, and using cars decreases as a consequence.
Second, cars deal significant damage to the environment and climate, by polluting the air we breathe and burning fossil fuels. Countries should stop being passive and authorities should end protecting major automobile companies, in order to prevent them from manufacturing air-polluting cars. Even if companies find a way to produce environmentally friendly cars, a reduction in the number of their products should not be neglected. The fewer cars a company produces, the fewer cars people can buy and it is an indirect way of lowering the use of cars and helping humanities to breathe.
To conclude, in twenty years, I think that roads will be depleted of cars and technology will cause major shifts in the transportation industry. Automobiles will not be functioning as they are today and future generations will not need to use personal cars in order to move privately to other places and there will be other ways of transport in use. Consequently, the shape of modern cities alters by reducing the need for multiple lane highways. Streets and urban landscape will also change, displacing by new-generation vehicles, pedestrian walkways, etc.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | theprasad | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Mangiring Pandapotan | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | daddy | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, second, so, for instance, i think, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22865013774 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96977618891 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564738292011 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7850441159 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.533333333 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223092848415 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076432308784 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751665614403 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144473481246 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605162686268 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.