Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Children start flourishing in academic environments from an early age. This academic environment prepares kids for development, and in it, teachers are one of the most important contributors. Some people are of the opinion that pupils are more influenced by their tutors rather than by their friends, and I substantiate their notion. I believe that students take advantage of their teachers in schools by providing two main reasons.
First, teachers are more experienced compared to the friends' students have. Kids usually become friends with other kids from the same age, and the lack of expertise at such young ages derives them towards making role-models and obeying them. However, teachers are trained people, and their ultimate objective is to teach their pupils different aspects of life skills. They wield influence over young kids by teaching them academic skills, social capabilities, responsibility, etc. For example, back in elementary school, my teacher Mrs. Bagheri taught us many aspects of life. She was an experienced teacher who did all she could to transmit her knowledge to young kids.
Second, teachers, in general, are responsible individuals, who are aware of their influences over young kids, and they hold responsibility for maturing their students. Comparing to friends, teachers are more cautious about their actions. They know that students observe their actions to learn from them; thus, teachers act more responsibly and carefully than friends that students can make. For clarification, friends of the same age usually interact with each other by playing games or hanging around, and they neglect the effects they can emerge in other people. So it should not be astonishing that students do not take their friends seriously. Teachers make sure of acting in a way that prevents students from engaging in immoral, deceptive, criminal activities in the future, while friends do not take their actions foreseen. To conclude, teachers influence students more than friends cause their actions do not entail the meaningless, dispensable, raving around that friends do. They create a sense of responsibility in the children's minds.
For the mentioned reasons, teachers influence their students more than others, especially friends that students have. They resemble responsible and experienced characteristics that other pupils see them as influential people who can be role-models, helping them towards a better life. First and foremost, the pupil-tutor bond is so strong that it will reflect its consequences until adulthood. Many students communicate with their teachers for many years, even after graduation.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, while, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2233.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51358024691 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86452743949 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545679012346 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7691468157 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0869565217 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17391304348 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332208392485 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113187561004 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102950857976 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222565774802 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650218712956 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.