a decline in reading the literature
In contrast to reading passages, which emphasizes on the reason and consequences of reading less litrature, the lecturer disagrees with all the points made in the reading and comes up with own idea about the decline of litrature reader. The lecturer disagrees with the passage for three reasons: creativity of other books, cultural impact due to decline of litrature reader and quality of today's readers.
First, according to the reading since litrature reader is decreasing it will have a direct impact on creativity among people. However, the lecture disagrees with this claim. The lecturer says that other genre are also creative and high quality. According to the lecturer, the reading has overlooked the quality of non-litrature books, rendering the unwarranted assumption that this will lead to decrease in creativity of the people.
Second, the reading states that due to decline in litrature the value of culture is decreasing. Nevertheless, this assertion is rejected by the lecturer citing that other non-litrature books are as well related to culture. Moreover, the lecturer bolster his claim saying that decline in litrature does not mean decline in culture because other forms of entertainment like music also have pleanty of cultural values in it. Furthermore, this forms of entertainment have direct impact on culture.
Third, the reading points out that the writing and reading of litrature is decreasing because of the poor standard of today's reader. But, the lecturer claims that the decline of litrature is not due to the poor quality of readers but it is because of the fact that today's writer does not write in a standard quality. This causes decrease in reader of litrature. To corroborate this claim, the lecturer mentions that modern author's writing is very difficult to understand.
- Self driving cars 68
- Our current way of living the life will have impact on future generations Agree of disagree 60
- Selling of fossils 73
- Internet Usage 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...o the poor quality of readers but it is because of the fact that todays writer does not write in a stand...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...ders but it is because of the fact that todays writer does not write in a standard qua...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, third, well, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28373702422 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76222979402 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449826989619 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5075860125 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.071428571 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20914432644 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813044262558 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901366744117 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147089600307 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547841916073 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.