Nowadays films are no longer made by big companies only Digital technology enables everybody to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays, films are no longer made by big companies only. Digital technology enables everybody to produce films.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

As the developments in the film industry have facilitated many small companies to produce films; this field was no longer dominated by big corporations. In my perspective, I do believe that this phenomenon could be beneficial for the film industries as well as the audiences.
Firstly, it is true that the increase in the number of film producer companies means more creative content could be introduced to the public. To be more specific, because of the shortage of technologies and financial resources, many ideas can not be implemented in films by small organizations. As a result, it leads to the limitation in types of movies and contents, which deteriorates the creativity in this seventh art. However, thanks to the developments in digital technologies, which help to reduce costs in making films, this not only gives chances for small organizations to produce films by themselves but also allows more directors to relisticize new ideas. This results in many blockbusters and unprecedented masterpieces; therefore, it will attract more people to go to theaters, earning more profits. According to a survey conducted in 2010, after having visual software to edit videos with ease, there was a surge in the profits of several theaters, because of the appearances of new companies in the film industry.
Secondly, audiences could enjoy more quality movies and have a variety of selections of films from many producers instead of only two or three options. To explain that, because there are only a few companies making films, people are likely to watch similar content in several movies. This would easily get them bored; therefore, they can not fully unwind after hard-working hours. But, this scenario would not happen if audiences could have numerous film production companies, which could generate breakthrough ideas. As a result, more films are available for audiences to watch whatever types of movies they want. In a survey made by CNN, the satisfaction of people watching movies increased dramatically since Netflix and Amazon, two of the biggest streaming movies platforms nowadays, were introduced in 2013.
In conclusion, having more businesses taking part in the film industry, because it brings benefits to both the audience and this seventh art.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-13 Saik 73 view
Essays by user Saik :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d many small companies to produce films; this field was no longer dominated by bi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2679558011 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95225299514 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3042830575 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21463026305 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764196616017 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646303497975 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140422653288 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669068914125 0.056905535591 118% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.