Nowadays, older people who need employment have to compete with the young people .What problems does this cause and what are the solutions.
Nowadays, it is become problem that older people who need employment have to compete with young people. In this essay, I will examine the idea why older people have to compete with young people to get a job.
Firstly, the reason why young people have great opportunity to be a job cause in Young age someone has a lot potential to learn faster and also that is why young people nowadays can be skilled in short time cause they are mastering technology. For example, for being a software engineer you have to learn in University around 4 year. But recently, adolescent be software engineer without degree cause they are learning it from youtube, website and etc in free and they could learn faster and more efficient than in University.
To solve this problem, there's possible solution for older people for more stand out to get a job with young people. The solution is by learning the technology. And also the company can categorize the applicant in different age. In this idea the older people and young people has they're own area to compete.
To conclude, older people have to compete with young people to employment. However, they can significantly maximize the potential by mastering technology to keep the older people have equal skill and can compete with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | heni Imroatul | 56 | view |
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with the young people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 56
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 56
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society How can this problem be solved
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... in University. To solve this problem, theres possible solution for older people for ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...a the older people and young people has theyre own area to compete. To conclude, olde...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48344828025 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2688352304 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7272727273 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458809231527 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209473267793 0.084324248473 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161972822369 0.0667982634062 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327518409864 0.151304729494 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133728609524 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... in University. To solve this problem, theres possible solution for older people for ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...a the older people and young people has theyre own area to compete. To conclude, olde...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 218.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83027522936 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48344828025 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 338.4 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2688352304 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7272727273 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458809231527 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209473267793 0.084324248473 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161972822369 0.0667982634062 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327518409864 0.151304729494 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133728609524 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.