The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports in three different areas.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The line graph demonstrates the amount of wheat exported in Australia, Canada and the European Community over a five-year course beginning in 1985.
Overall, it is immediately evident that there was a downward trend that can be seen in the surveyed areas, with the exception of the European Community. Also, wheat from Canada was widely distributed more than the other two in most time during the period.
As can be observed from the chart, the figure for Canada stood at roughly 20 million tonnes and simultaneously top the list. Canada after that had witnessed a slight decrease before rocketing substantially and reaching its peak at 25 million tonnes in 1988. However, the number shrank abruptly to just under 15 million one year later and continued rising 5 more million tonnes at last.
With the remaining countries, Australia started at the most humble point with only 15 million and ascended minimally to about 16 million in 1986. The amount of wheat then fell consistently and finished at a lower point compared to the initial one, with approximately 12 million tonnes in 1990. In contrast, European nations experienced a moderate decline right at the first stage, from around 17 million down to almost 15 million tonnes. The number, however, started to go up again and surpassed both Australia and Canada to become the king at the end with just above 20 million tonnes.
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports in three different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports in three different areas Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...that can be seen in the surveyed areas, with the exception of the European Community. Also, wheat fro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... year later and continued rising 5 more million tonnes at last. With the remaining cou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, then, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99567099567 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63562781619 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.7108803272 43.030603864 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0628903770314 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293897746115 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203167358416 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443834238341 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228831766312 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.