Some people are of the opinion that the surest indicator of a great nation is represented by the achievement of its rulers, scientists or artist as against the general welfare of its people. Even though this belief seems to align with many underlying principles of judging a great nation, I will say that it is a biased view. Contrarily, I am of the opinion that the general welfare of the people should be regarded as the indicator of a great nation.
Over time, "great" rulers, scientist and artist have been highly lauded for their contributions to the greatness of nations. However, when this is done, the most salient parts of their contribution-mostly the negative effects of their contribution- are often ignored. Some things to be considered are mentioned in the following paragraph.
Firstly, rulers of great nations in the part have worked hand in hand with scientists in ensuring the scientific and technological advancement of the nations. However good this may sound, many at times, the health of the citizens is not often considered being one of great importance. Through history, a lot of damage has been done as touching the health of many citizens in achieving breakthroughs in technological advancements. A good example is the introduction of DDT as an insecticide many years ago in a country called Negorio. While DDT successfully removed pests from crops in local and industrial farms, its deleterious effect was far more pronounced than was expected. After months of using the insecticide, many people died of food poisoning. It was then discovered that there was a wash off of insecticides into rivers and streams. Unfortunately, aquatic animals were poisoned and DDT ultimately found its way into the body systems of citizens, since they fed on fishes. Even though a modern scientist will argue that more biodegradable insecticides have been introduced over the years, the prowess of science cannot be trusted to essentially prevent similar occurrences in the nearest future, especially with the understanding that a pandemic has recently occurred because of a disease which broke out because of a slight oversight during a scientific research.
Moreover, many renowned rulers are lauded to have done well as a result of a general improvement in national infrastructure. This seems to be a good reason to laud a ruler. However, it is good to consider the backend of these developments. In the process of building roads, bridges and offices, many people have been made homeless and many more have been given over to abject poverty. This is because some landed properties of some citizens, for example, are usually hijacked by the government during road construction, leaving the citizens who hitherto had depended on these properties for feeding either through farming or other forms of use with nothing left to survive on. In fact, some citizens who are prone to infections relating to breathing get ill as because of pollution in the process of these infrastructural development. All these could be curbed if the ruler will pay more attention to the welfare of the people by probably building new infrastructures in remote areas. Untill conditions like these are taken into consideration, no nation desrves to be called a great nation.
In addition, artists from certain nations with strong traditional artistic backgrounds tend to protect these background by contributing generally to the international fame of art which stem from the nation. Instead of looking for ways by which the emotional needs of people through art, they rather forcus on raising the bar of creativity to international standards, protecting the fame of the "nation's" art. A good example is the sublte morphism that occred to Juju music when it was taken to the international level. MUch of the rudimetary elemets were modified intryingto make it fit for international acceptance, thereby leaving the traditional satisfaction of loclas out of consideraton. Much of what is left of Juju music today no longer appeals to the hearing of locales. In the name of making the nation great, citizens have been emotionally starved by its artists.
Finally, except adverse effect of decisions of rulers, scientists and arists are looked into, by considerting the general wilfare of the people, the natoin will not be truely great. The defficiency inprovision which is a derivative of salient oversights will only lead to the raisng of a deficient people. Ultimately, there will remain no citizen sound enough to fill this gap in the future, since children are being inured to the paucity of proper welfare.
In conclusion, with all that has been said, the indicator of a great nation is represented by hte general welfare of its people and not the achievement of its rulers, artists or scientists.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by intsilling in theme a sense of cooperation not competition 83
- Ways to predict earthquakes 80
- Super screen should allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public 49
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies that any other 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1352, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...ut because of a slight oversight during a scientific research. Moreover, many renowned rulers are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of its rulers, artists or scientists.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 136.0 58.6224719101 232% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4043.0 2235.4752809 181% => OK
No of words: 780.0 442.535393258 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18333333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.28474030464 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07988612672 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 377.0 215.323595506 175% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1269.9 704.065955056 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.2370786517 163% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.863507181 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.515151515 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69696969697 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358306169312 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901668706711 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155751304492 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22885511984 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.210836538612 0.0667264976115 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 203.0 100.480337079 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.