Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and air pollution problems. To some extent do you agree?
It seems that traffic and air pollution are insoluble problems in some countries. One of the suggestions to solve these problems is increasing the price of petrol. To a certain extent, I agree that it can decrease the traffic and air pollution; however I believe that there are some better strategies to deal with these problems.
There are some reasons that may justify the increase of the gasoline price by governments. Firstly, this limitation enforces people to use different type of public transportations such as, metros, buses, or taxis. Consequently, it may prevent the use of private cars in crowded cities. Secondly, it can put strain on some industries, which use petrol as a raw material, to transform their previous methods into some more sustainable methods and less fuel consuming machines.
On the other hand, I believe that these kinds of limitations should be accompanied with providing several essential requirements. In other words, if the cost of gasoline is raised, while there are not sufficient public transportation systems, it may exacerbate traffic problem. As a result, it is argued that the main role of government to solve these problems is supporting and providing the public transportation systems, and maybe in parallel with public transportation improvement, they should eventually raise the price of petrol.
In summary, there are some advantages for growing petrol price; however, there are several better programs can be taken into account to tackle traffic and air pollution problems by governments.
- linear process 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the sun 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in summary, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34979423868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00794614522 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551440329218 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.694562549 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.181818182 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0909090909 7.06120827912 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332811688817 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131857602574 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110540891479 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221427498816 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133143055503 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.