The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two plans depcits how a public park was looked like in th year 1920 and how it looks like today.
Overall, there are some addition of features in Grange Park. Some features remain same as it were earlier. Moreover, there is change in location of some features.
It is observable from the graph that number of seats present today are same as it were earlier but the location of seats have changed. Both the Entrances, one from Arnold avenue and other from Eldon streets remains same. In 1920, Fountain used to be at the centre of park. Now, it is replaced with rose garden. At the North-East corner of the park the pond for water plants is now replaced with children's play area. There is addition of underground car parking facility, Entrrance of which is located outside of South east corner of park.
At the South- East corner of the park there is addition of Water feature in place of glass house. Next to the children's play area there is introduction of Cafe which have replaced one of the rose garden. In place of stage of musicians, Amphitheatre for concerts has been built. There is removal of rose garden from North-West corner of the park.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-23 | v.jindal2904@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 Th table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main f 67
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the cause What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 56
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63768115942 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32860263981 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541062801932 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2739523419 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.5714285714 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7857142857 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64285714286 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194867275392 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689228306779 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548768954995 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121907913312 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268907346926 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.04 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.