As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree

In the modern world, the high-end technology makes human life very easy. One of its benefits is translation applications. People can get the meaning of any sentence or word in many languages with the help of such apps. Therefore, some people think that learning foreign languages is a waste of time that I disagree with.

Firstly, in the present times, almost everyone has a mobile phone which can run translation applications. They have an understandable panel, and it is easy to use them. Apps can show people meaning, spelling, pronunciation, even antonyms, and synonyms of the words. People can use them both online from the websites and offline with downloading. Additionally, technology is developing every day, and developers add new features to the apps each year.

On the other hand, there is not a proper education system and equipment in every country. Therefore, students who want good education should study in the foreign universities which have language requirements. Correspondingly, students need to learn foreign languages. Additionally, dependence on translation applications can be annoying after a while. Watching the phone during the whole conversation can damage to the quality of communication. Furthermore, translation applications do not give hundred percent results for less popular languages.

To conclude, although there are advantages of translation applications, learning a language is still important in terms of education and communication. Therefore, I would disagree with the idea that learning a language is a waste of time.

Votes
Average: 4.8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...e, translation applications do not give hundred percent results for less popular langua...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 240.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28885956256 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4142771339 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.3529411765 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1176470588 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213693472632 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693066383233 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920399535029 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148558371941 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092100094687 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.