Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In today’s world, a great deal of litter has been produced by humans. Among their waste, there are a lot of waste which could be recycled in order to be used again such as papers, plastic. One of the practical ways to stimulate people to reuse their garbage is by legislating some regulations. I myself consider some significant reasons why rules are required to propel citizen to reproduce waste which will be clarified in this essay.
To commence with, a considerable aspect of encouraging people to recycle is the fact that without forcing them, it has been impossible to make them do something. In fact, people have always desired to choose the easiest way in their life and if there was nobody to stop them carrying some horrible acts out, they would do them anyway. Therefore, there should be several punishments for residents who have not pursued the recycling rules. Under those circumstance, because they have not fond of being punished for example by paying extra money to governments, they would definitely obey the rules. As a result, more litter can be reused.
Additionally, individuals’ knowledge about scientific and academic subjects are limited. Because all of them may not be educated or if they are, they may not identified environmental issues to be significant. So, some experts or well-known authorities who have been aware of solutions for various difficulties should tell them what the problems are and how to solve them. Hence, implementing some rules could be an action in order to not only increase people’s information, but also make them regard some aspects of their life as problems which should be solved.
To sum up, although there have been several methods to lead people do more recycling, one of the effective way is to applying regulation about its topic. Based on writer’s opinion, importance of enforcing humans and shortage of their awareness have been two main reasons why rules are needed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 84
- One of the debating issue for offenders who had served their prison sentence and they have been free is society again is reoffending their crime But there are some measures that could be taken in order to tackle this important problem 56
- Is technology time consuming or does it save time 67
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 73
- Children nowadays spend a great deal of time watching television However television cannot replace the book as a learning tool which is why children are less well educated today To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0652173913 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77462009052 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1345514765 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239831318693 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760969565284 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519162552408 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140239170312 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459372776742 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.