It is a widely held belief that environmental issues can be solved only by huge companies and governments and common people still can't help. I disagree with this because I believe that this problem must be treated from the both aspects.
Many people claim that large organisations and governments have resources and power such as money or influence to help the environment and therefore they should take responsibility. In addition, if people act without agreement or contact with these structures, their strength would be too limited and it would be impossible to make a contribution for solution. Furthermore, governments and companies are playing an important role in our society and culture and if they promote an ecologically friendly business and lifestyle and support, for instance, recycling, it would imminently influence out point of view on this topic.
On the other hand, these powerful structures at the very beginning were created in order to help and service people. Therefore, it would be hard for them to deny damages to the environment if all of us would disagree with their policy and stop supporting them, for example, by buying products they produce. Moreover, all individuals, even though they aren't rich or don't have any valuable connections, should also help and take part. To illustrate, the government can provide an opportunity to recycle waste, but it is citizens who must sort this garbage.
To conclude, although common people don't have such resources and influence as governments and large companies, we should deal with this problem together, otherwise it won't be so effective.
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 73
- the graph below shows the number of enquiries received by Tourist Information Office in one city a six month period in 2011 78
- The tables below give information about the amount of beer and fruit juice consumed per person per year in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The tables below give information about the amount of beer and fruit juice consumed per person per year in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
guess he doesn't like my…
guess he doesn't like my apostrophes???????????
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...and governments and common people still cant help. I disagree with this because I be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...over, all individuals, even though they arent rich or dont have any valuable connecti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...viduals, even though they arent rich or dont have any valuable connections, should a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e. To conclude, although common people dont have such resources and influence as go...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2277992278 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92912049482 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6138996139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.4469177081 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.4 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117443667947 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491766391079 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432970078435 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076198593938 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292702367699 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.