As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The past decades have seen rapid growth in the technological sector. With the increase in technology, the dependence of humans on technology has also increased rapidly. But I can't entirely agree with the statement that if people rely more on technology, then the thinking ability of humans will surely deteriorate. I oppose the statement due to the following reasons.
First, relying on technology to solve problems helps us to improve our current methods of learning and makes us more efficient. For example, there is an ample amount of sources for learning on the internet today. Still, to utilize these sources, we need to work hard on the concepts and make use of the knowledge which is available on the internet. Thus, using the internet here not only helps us to solve problems quickly, but it also improves our current understanding of the topics which we need to search on the internet. Also, this helps us to improve the efficiency, productivity, and accuracy of our tasks.
Second, if humans become more and more dependent on technology, then the level of technology should increase to meet the ever-growing demands of humans. But this demand is met by humans only by creating better and new technology with time. For example, the development of neural networks in the past decade has made many top companies of the world dependent on them. But the accuracy of these neural networks should keep on increasing, and this increase in accuracy is also met by other humans which should keep on making better models of neural networks. Thus, this is a continuous chain which means that the more we rely on technology, more and faster will be the development of new technology.
But, in some aspects relying excessively on technology has deteriorated the condition, especially if before clearing fundamentals, a person gets the required technology. For example, many people nowadays are so dependent on technology that they cannot even compute the basic arithmetic operations without a calculator. This can have severe consequences. Another example is that of social media whose usage in the past decade has increased by manifold. People nowadays are too dependent on social media that they are entirely out of touch with reality. So, relying on technology is not harmful but relying 'only' on technology without using your brain cells is very detrimental.
Although there are some demerits of relying excessively on technology to solve our problems but we safely can say that the number of merits outperforms the demerits. Hence, technology helps us to increase the productivity and efficiency of our tasks.
- Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reas 58
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 62
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 50
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 50
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 69
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ology has also increased rapidly. But I cant entirely agree with the statement that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, still, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1261682243 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83610985059 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457943925234 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5459641224 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273926863225 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778499710575 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732200386622 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151771492871 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604002424298 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ology has also increased rapidly. But I cant entirely agree with the statement that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, so, still, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1261682243 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83610985059 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457943925234 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5459641224 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273926863225 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778499710575 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732200386622 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151771492871 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604002424298 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.