The bar graph provides information on the ratio of homes that were built throughout the time period of ten years (from 2000 to 2009) in Derby and Nottingham.
Overall, the number of houses constructed in both cities has experienced a rapid increase from 2000 until 2009. However, the percentage of constructions in Derby has risen gradually, while in Nottingham the trend has fluctuated in certain periods, and by the end, of 2009 it reaches its peak.
More specifically, in 2000 it is evidenced that the ratio of houses built in Nottingham was a little bit higher than the respective ratio in Derby (50 houses were constructed in Nottingham as opposed to nearly 47 houses in Derby). Then, the trend of Derby rises substantially at around 130 houses and remains stable for five years, while the trend of Nottingham starts to decline and eventually plummets in 2006 at nearly two houses constructed. The biggest difference between the two cities is highlighted in 2008 when almost 270 homes are built in Derby, in contrast to approximately 3 houses in Nottingham.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Parents of obese children should be punished for making their children fat Do you agree or disagree 61
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 95, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...tio of houses built in Nottingham was a little bit higher than the respective ratio in Der...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98314606742 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89742255155 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.7187149695 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.833333333 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396682636118 0.215688989381 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188693494346 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568871880597 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252963732367 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030254168103 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.