The graph below shows radio and television audiences of United Kingdom throughout the day in the year 1992.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Given the graph which illustrates the percentage of UK radio and TV audiences throughout a day in 1992. Figures are registered for different hours ranging from 1 AM to 24PM and numbers are counted in the proportion of the UK population ( over 4 years old).
At a single glance, it is evident that more people tended to watch TV than listening to the radio back then in general.
Specifically, at the beginning of the given time, proportions are 45 and 6% for radio and TV followers, respectively. From 1AM to 6 AM, the number stood still for a short course time. Although the two lines formed similar patterns at that time, the percentage of TV watchers was moderately ahead of radio’s. However, at 6,00 in the morning, the number of radio listeners outran TV audiences’ and underwent a sharp ascent. It reached a peak and got about 25% of the UK population listening to radio at 8 in the morning. Nevertheless, the percentage of radio followers gradually diminished and stopped at 15% in the afternoon. Whilst, the number of TV watchers witnessed active oscillation. Notwithstanding that, it took over radio listeners at 13,00 and showed sights of noticeable growth at 15 PM. Overall, at 15 in the afternoon, the proportion of TV and radio audiences are 15% and 10% orderly.
From 5 PM onwards, a plethora of people started to enjoy their TV time and fewer people listened to the radio. Accordingly, the number of TV audiences rose overwhelmingly and hit a high point at 45%. Later on, the number tanked and ended by 15% and the end of the day. Meanwhile, the percentage of radio audiences oscillated and got 4% of listeners at the very end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-03 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 56 | view |
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph and chart give information about the migration to the UK between 2000 and 2008 The line graph shows the intended length of stay of immigrants The pie chart shows the reasons for migration to the UK in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the proportion of the UK population over 4 years old. At a single glance, i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, nevertheless, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1360.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73867595819 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96562147057 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2959497443 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126113275634 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528886917936 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481239130731 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907977073089 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548308705642 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.