The graph below shows radio and television audiences of United Kingdom throughout the day in the year 1992.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Given the graph which illustrates the percentage of UK radio and TV audiences throughout a day in 1992. Figures are registered for different hours ranging from 1 AM to 24PM and numbers are counted in the proportion of the UK population ( over 4 years old).
At a single glance, it is evident that more people tended to watch TV than listening to the radio back then in general.
Specifically, at the beginning of the given time, proportions are 45 and 6% for radio and TV followers, respectively. From 1AM to 6 AM, the number stood still for a short course time. Although the two lines formed similar patterns at that time, the percentage of TV watchers was moderately ahead of radio’s. However, at 6,00 in the morning, the number of radio listeners outran TV audiences’ and underwent a sharp ascent. It reached a peak and got about 25% of the UK population listening to radio at 8 in the morning. Nevertheless, the percentage of radio followers gradually diminished and stopped at 15% in the afternoon. Whilst, the number of TV watchers witnessed active oscillation. Notwithstanding that, it took over radio listeners at 13,00 and showed sights of noticeable growth at 15 PM. Overall, at 15 in the afternoon, the proportion of TV and radio audiences are 15% and 10% orderly.
From 5 PM onwards, a plethora of people started to enjoy their TV time and fewer people listened to the radio. Accordingly, the number of TV audiences rose overwhelmingly and hit a high point at 45%. Later on, the number tanked and ended by 15% and the end of the day. Meanwhile, the percentage of radio audiences oscillated and got 4% of listeners at the very end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-03 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown 78
- the diagram shows the process for canning pears Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main details and making comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 according to United Nations statistics Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in the proportion of the UK population over 4 years old. At a single glance, it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69534050179 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87032107591 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8093397081 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.875 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122792089141 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509075205999 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497341179681 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103226495926 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376802639548 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.