The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given the table which sets out data about the proportion of water utility 6 of countries in the year 2003. Figures are registered for domestic, industrial, and agricultural sectors.
At first glance, in the researching time, domestic water usage was not as much as the two other segments. Whatsmore, china's agriculture used up the largest water percentage at 87% while 2% was utilized by Australia as the least water proportion contrasting to the whole table.
Looking at the graph in more detail, Domestic water was mostly used in Australia and the least in China, with 65% and 6% respectively. The table also provides information that Canada employed the most extravagant water percentage for industrialization progresses among stated countries. Meanwhile, Australia only spent 2% in the same category. In the same way, China consumed 87% of water for agricultural use, which was the highest percentage of water usage not only in the above-mentioned sector but also in contrast to the whole given table. Additionally, the UK's 4% of water employment proportion was the tiniest fracture used in cultivating. What is also striking is Russia's 62% industrial water usage, turkey's 73% agricultural water, etc... which are all overwhelmingly high numbers adjacent to Canada's 8% cultivating water utility and Turkey's 16% water consumed for the domestic sphere.
Overall, industrial and agricultural water applications had pretty similar patter, while domestic purposes used up less water.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-11 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | Trần Thị Quỳnh Chi | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences of United Kingdom throughout the day in the year 1992 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 56
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and chart give information about the migration to the UK between 2000 and 2008 The line graph shows the intended length of stay of immigrants The pie chart shows the reasons for migration to the UK in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting 46
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4329004329 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0816795034 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 283.868780488 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8787288315 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168380811647 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698027722716 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433374698702 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107404892054 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024700000701 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.