An investigation on the number of trips to other countries made by UK dwellers and their purposes was made between 1989 and 2001. The investigation was shown by a line graph and a table, whose figures registered for million of trips, 4 specific reasons and the total number of trips per annum.
At first glance, it is obvious that 1998 was a boom in the total number of trips with 73,5 millions travels made. Together with that, the majority of US citizens prefered to making their trips to travel on holidays during the course of time.
According to the graph and table, at the beginning of the period, 47 millions trips were made with 30 million of them went on holidays. Following are business,paying family visits and other reasons with 9 - 6-3 millions, respectively .1992 witnessed a slightly higher trend with 55,5 millions trips stated. Holidays continued to account for the major part and kept rising sharply when the other 3 purposes went through ascending time. The same trend went on to 1993 with 68 millions trips, except for a noticeable drop in the amount of business trips and other causes. 3 years later, the total number of trips hit a high at nearly 74 millions, as well as 50 millions trips on holidays. Travels on family visits kept growing gradually, whereas categories which went down in 1993 maintained their declines. Despite the growing trend, in 2001, figures encountered a descent to only 61 millions trips left. Only the quantity of trips paid for faimily joining escalated to 10 millions and more, meawhile all patterns undergone diminishment, include 19 millions trips on holidays, 9 million on business and 2 million on other reasons stated.
Overall, before 1992 onwards, people in the UK did not hanging out much. UK citizens had made many travels to other countries mostly in 1998, as they eagered holidays abroad. However, After the year 2000, the trend showed signs of a go-down in almost every categories.
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown 78
- The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The table below shows the percentage of water used in three sectors in six different countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph and chart give information about the migration to the UK between 2000 and 2008 The line graph shows the intended length of stay of immigrants The pie chart shows the reasons for migration to the UK in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting 46
- the diagram shows the process for canning pears Write a report of at least 150 words summarizing the main details and making comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...d a table, whose figures registered for million of trips, 4 specific reasons and the to...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...aking their trips to travel on holidays during the course of time. According to the graph and table...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , paying
...went on holidays. Following are business,paying family visits and other reasons with 9 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'hang'
Suggestion: hang
... 1992 onwards, people in the UK did not hanging out much. UK citizens had made many tra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, whereas, while, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 965.302439024 167% => OK
No of words: 330.0 196.424390244 168% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89696969697 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5867908563 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 106.607317073 168% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542424242424 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 283.868780488 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8778162766 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195214092004 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737578537473 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588917270243 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134047129772 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761263109726 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.