Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Two forms of conveying information that are predominant in the modern world are verbal and written communication. From a personal perspective, it is worth underlining that a spoken dialogue permits more flexibility than writing does. By way of comparison, hardly can we deny the precision and formality characteristics that are typical of a written document.
To assess the benefits of orally delivering information, we must bring a sense of genuineness and interaction into focus. Assuming an individual, for example, could speak eloquently with assertiveness, no barriers would be too formidable to cross in terms of persuasion. Not only is the conversation more accessible due to the falling or rising tone of voice, but body gestures and facial expressions also show the depth of emotion that the speaker is experiencing. A leader, for instance, displaying his passions and dedication through works can inspire his followers and lift morale. Another plus point to mention is that in this digital era where communication heavily relies upon social media, a direct spoken conversation would facilitate deeper mutual connection.
Although so far, it can be deduced that oral communication is of the essence, we must take into account the ability to keep a record of written communication before jumping into conclusions of any kind. Being stored on papers or computers, these pieces of information are often served as legal documents, business contracts, and medical records. As a result, it is worth mentioning that these documents are treated as proof that can be used to initiate prosecution against someone. On top of that, written texts can reflex one's personality according to my personal observation. Detail-oriented people pay attention to their handwriting to make it legible, whereas hasty individuals tend to pay less attention.
Taking both sides into perspective, I arrive at the conclusion that neither is better than the other, and it all comes down to specific circumstances that the speaker and the listener are in. I personally believe both oral and written communications are sets of skills that need sharpening if people want to improve their relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 95
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The graph below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 (percentage) 89
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n top of that, written texts can reflex ones personality according to my personal ob...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39766081871 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2040913792 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646198830409 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0467713749 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.066666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15339507819 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432123676655 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479803119988 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910005274159 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220770272303 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.