Everyone can agree that it is important to encourage young people to eat healthy meals when at school. However, the source of these meals is a debated topic. Some feel schools must be responsible for providing young people with meals, while other argue parents best uphold this responsibility. This essay will analyze both sides of this debate before drawing a conclusion.
Firstly, it is often argued that a standard for healthfulness can be monitor when meals are prepared and served by the school. For example, most Japanese high schools provide students with hot lunches and monthly meal plan that are closely monitored by the school to ensure all students are eating a balanced and healthful diet. As this sort of monitoring is not possible when each and every student is bringing a different lunch from home, the benefits of such an approach to primary and secondary meal options can be seen.
However, the cultural impact of such standardized meal practice should be remembered. For instance, major cities like Toronto boast a very ethnically-diverse student base. As these students are from differnt ethnicities and backgrounds, their dietary preferences vary widely. Expecting these students to conform to a standardized school meal may be an affront to their culture and palate. Thus, there are clear benefits is the most beneficial approach to nourishing primary and secondary students.
The above discussion puts forth several convincing arguments for both sides of this debate. However, in the interest of the healthfulness of young people, it is felt that a standardized lunch organized and carried out by school is the most beneficial approach to nourishing primary and secondary students.
- People should have the right to carry a gun as crime rate is on the increase 67
- More and more people are forgetting the meanings behind occasions such as national festivals What do you think are the causes of this What solutions do you suggest 78
- Some people feel schools should be responsible for providing lunch to primary and secondary students Other think parents should send their children to school with box luches made at home Analyse both positions 61
- Despite spending several years in Yekaterinburg he could not speak a word of Russian Some cultures value old age while others value young age Discuss both attitudes and express your opinion 73
- In prosperity our friends know us in adversity we know our friends Write an essay outline how you define friendship 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30147058824 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86971079586 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566176470588 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3010333407 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319061822885 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100799107022 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743470093138 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182252718923 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402985459164 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30147058824 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86971079586 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566176470588 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3010333407 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319061822885 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100799107022 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743470093138 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182252718923 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402985459164 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.