Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today are more willing to help others than those in the past.
Without any shadow of doubts, helping others is one of the most prominent virtues and trends which are tightly embedded in human’s spirit. However, people always make a tough decision considering whether they are supposed to offer help those people in desperate need of support. Some maintain that nowadays people are too indifferent to help others than before, while others entertain great doubts about it. As far as I am concerned,
Above all, people today have sufficient financial foundation to champion others. With the fast-paced development of the society and the proliferation of global economy, people generally confront more commercial opportunities to expand their business. Therefore, people are expected to acquire considerably higher income than before. Jack, my uncle, is a good case in point. 20 years ago, he was struggled with the issue of gaining enough food and necessities to maintain basic life. Not even to mention he didn’t have extra money to help others. However, he has earned an affluence of money over these years. As a result, he may be more willing to deliver their assistance when someone is trapped into dilemma.
In addition to formidable economic foundation, the runaway of the development of cutting-edged technology gives the new way for people to render their assistance. In the past, if someone got into serious disease like cancer and is in desperate need of support, his genuine situation could be known only by the people around him due to inefficiency of conveying information. On the contrary, the prevalence of social media renders it possible to offer people’s assistance to more groups of people immediately. For example, last week I saw a public service advertising which announced a dying people with her actual situation on the website. Consequently, an increasing number of residents give a hand since the spread of genuine information has generate public’s empathy.
We cannot deprecate the phenomenon that there are still some people refuse to help people in need. Although some people are still unwilling to donate money or participate in rescuing action even though they are available in economic foundation or fully aware of the people’s confrontation, they only take up a small portion. The majority of people to a large extend tend to give their help due to the finer assertion and awareness than the past.
Some people still consider past people more willing to help others, while coming to this issue, how can one possibly deny the distinct tendency above of the modern people?
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to choose a university whose graduates have good job opportunities than a university who has famous professors Use specific examples to support your answer 73
- Students who keep their rooms neat and organized are more successful than those who do not 90
- Young people today are more willing to help others than those in the past 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today are more willing to help others than those in the past 93
- The school has been funding for students to participate in different types of activities but this year due to the lack of money the school will fund only one activity Which one should the school fund sports arts or volunteering 98
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubts about it. As far as I am concerned, Above all, people today have sufficient ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when someone is trapped into dilemma. In addition to formidable economic found...
^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'generated'.
Suggestion: generated
...e the spread of genuine information has generate public’s empathy. We cannot deprecat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation has generate public’s empathy. We cannot deprecate the phenomenon that ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assertion and awareness than the past. Some people still consider past people m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19902912621 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79624291785 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0058691908 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268003180093 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761998574526 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534305002946 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155608339593 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341049878344 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ubts about it. As far as I am concerned, Above all, people today have sufficient ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... when someone is trapped into dilemma. In addition to formidable economic found...
^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'generated'.
Suggestion: generated
...e the spread of genuine information has generate public’s empathy. We cannot deprecat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation has generate public’s empathy. We cannot deprecate the phenomenon that ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assertion and awareness than the past. Some people still consider past people m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19902912621 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79624291785 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0058691908 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.1 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268003180093 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761998574526 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534305002946 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155608339593 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341049878344 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.