The given graph illustrates the wheat exports in 3 specific areas, namely Australia, Canada and European Community between 1985 and 1990.
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of wheat exports from Canada kept fluctuated after the 5 years period, while this number for European Community has an increase, and Australia showed a drop.
To be more specific, in 1985, Canada exported about 18 tonnes of wheat. The line increased significantly and reached a peak of 25 tonnes after 3 years. Then, the year 1989 witnessed a dramatic fall at 9 tonnes of wheat exports and went back to the initial number in 1990.
Besides, European Community started with 17 tonnes of wheat and went down to 13 in 1986. However, they had experienced a sharp growth of exports by the end of the period, attained more than 21 tonnes compared to the past and deathroned Canada. Contrastly, the exports number of Australia just increased slowly at 16 tonnes and decreased repeatedly in the following years. Lastly, it got the third place and was the least wheat exported country.
- The line graph below shows the quantity of wheat exports from 1985 to 1990 84
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, lastly, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89444444444 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58085903012 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4007700697 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279517027498 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115233203063 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712043053894 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181444638579 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577938626962 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.