The pie charts depict the number of journal articles which are read by the proportion of all students, PhD candidates and junior faculties weekly at an Australian University.
As the charts outline, per every week, a significant proportion of all kinds of students read up to five journal articles; simultaneously, PhD candidates opt more than twelve magazines. On the other hand, 6 to 11 publications are read by junior professors.
In detail, around two-thirds (67%) of candidates read up to five journal publications per week which is three times higher than that of 6 to 11 journal readable candidates (21%) whereas, more than twelve such books are read by more than one in ten persons (12). According to PhD students scenario, the four-fifth proportion of such scholars read more than 12 journal magazines per week; in contrast, around five books are read by just 5% of students. Nevertheless, 15% of PhD scholars choose to read around 6 to 11 books weekly.
Concerning to junior faculties, a three-quarter of such professors read 6 to 11 journal articles weekly; while, approximately one-quarter of those prefer to read more than 12 books. However, just 1% of those read up to five books weekly.
- The table shows the percentage of the rooms occupied in six hotels during May to September between 1985 and 2000 The table also indicates the star rating of each hotel Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 77
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion? 73
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephones per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 73
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010. summarise the information and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Some people think that there are things individuals can do to help prevent global climate change Others believe that actions of individuals are wasteful and irrelevant and it is only government and large businesses that can make a difference Discuss both 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01558866558 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0418479384 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.23603664747 201% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331465479455 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167280138916 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126912925209 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252944639919 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128550453986 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.