It is natural process for animal species to become extinct ( dinosaurs and dodos). There is no reason for people to prevent them from this happening. To what extend do you agree or disagree
In this contemporary society, the extinction of different species is an inevitable process of nature, invoking the imbalance in the ecosystem. In addition, it is widely considered that the prevention of this pressing problem is unnecessary and can occur without the contribution of humans. In my own perspective, I totally disapprove with this point of view.
To begin with, one of the main factors why humans have to be responsible for the extinction of certain species is that they extremely abuse animals for various purposes. Additionally, hunting or poaching for commercial targets causes a massive decline in the number of species. Moreover, it is the process of cultivation and habitation that the loss of animal habitats emerges on a large scale.In order to improve this tense situation, people not only have to present more awareness to preserve the environment for animals but also need to reduce the time spent on hunting.
Moreover, animals play an important role in maintaining the biodiversity. In addition, humans, animals, plants and other forms of life create a massive ecosystem and influence each other.If a certain specie is eradicated, it will negatively affect the animals which parasitized on it, disrupting the ecological balance of the whole universe. For instance, without dodos, carnivores can suffer from starvation due to the lack of food chain. Consequently, the opportune measurements provided from citizens are really important to enhance the balance between humans and nature.
Taking everything into consideration, the conventional idea which underestimates the solutions of reducing the rate of extinction is erroneous. Moreover, due to many foremost reasons, I believe that humans are the main responsibilities for the prevention of endangered species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-09 | quynhnhi280103 | 78 | view |
- More and more people want to buy famous brands or clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- An increasing number of people are changing their careers What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- 35 The following chart shows the amount of tea and coffee imported by Canada UK USA and Germany in 2007 in tonnes
- In modern age some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicylces while in other cities riding bike is replacing cars Why is this case Which development is better 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cur without the contribution of humans. In my own perspective, I totally disapprov...
^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...nimal habitats emerges on a large scale.In order to improve this tense situation, ...
^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...sive ecosystem and influence each other.If a certain specie is eradicated, it will...
^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ea which underestimates the solutions of reducing the rate of extinction is erron...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, moreover, really, so, for instance, in addition, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53818181818 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16959522405 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607272727273 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4548196563 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235245413282 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748600652307 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456187638497 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12802019214 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508464881397 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.