The given line graph and the table detail the statistical report on water usage at the global levels and in two countries(Brazil and the democratic republic of congo) in three sectors including domestic, industrial, and agricultural over a century from 1900 to 2000.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that despite a significant increase in water usage in all the sectors, the agricultural sector continued to lead the chart. Moreover, being the largest in size, Brazil reported the maximum water consumption per person.
According to the given illustration, to begin at 55km3, the industrial sector rose steadily to 1000km3 in 1950 before dramatically rising to a peak of 3000km3. In contrast, the industrial and domestic use followed a similar pattern until 1950 with the former outweighs the latter, however, both witnessed a surge to climb at 1000km3 and 400km3 respectively by the period end.
Turning to the table, with a maximum of 176 million population, Brazil utilized most of the water to irrigate 26 500 square km of land as against only 5.2 million population and just 100 square km area in congo. Also, Brazil reported nearly 45 times more water consumption per person as compared to only 8 cubic meters in congo in the year 2000.
- Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child s education Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time Discuss both these views and give your opinion 95
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 77
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: largest
... to lead the chart. Moreover, being the largest in size, Brazil reported the maximum water cons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, moreover, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09047619048 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84418091537 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5139437265 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.714285714 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164147358214 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727464097196 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489224507452 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947248155798 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475605356698 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.