The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters
traveling each day by car, bus, or train between 1970 and 2030.
The given line chart compares the number of people(in millions) who traveled within the UK using a car, bus, or, train over a period of 60 decades until 2030.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the use of all the vehicles but one increased over time. Also, cars continued to be the most popular commuting mean throughout the period.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, nearly 5 million people used cars that continued over a decade. Thereafter, the number increased significantly before leveling off at 7 million for 10 consecutive years in a row. After which, it observed an upward trend until 2020 and further is expected to rise dramatically, reaching a peak of 9 million by 2030.
Turning to the bus and train figures, followed by a reverse trend, the former, which started at 4 million passengers, compared to only half train commuters, witnessed a substantial dropdown, at nearly 3.3 million by 2020. By contrast, the latter went up prior to reaching a plateau at 3 million by 2010. However, as per the future figures, the train is envisaged to outweigh the bus service by the period end( 5 million as against 3 million passengers).
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 47
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 78
- The bar chart shows the number of hot dogs and buns are eaten in 15 minutes by the winners of Nathan s Hot Dog Eating Contest in Brooklyn The USA between 1980 and 2010 78
- 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92574257426 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81284410371 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3010277723 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15094212773 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624516837751 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664354516334 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104549486674 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740639662934 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.