The given bar graph details the statistical report showing the weekly spendings on an average in the houses from 10 regions over a period of 3 years from 2007 to 2009.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the city of London witnessed the maximum household expenditures followed next by
the Southeast, however, the least was observed in the Northeast.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, more than 500 euros were spent by the London residents, which was just 20 euros more than the Southeast region. Moreover, Whilst England and Southeast stayed on par with each other at just below 500 euros, by contrast, the Southwest spent merely 10 euros fewer than the east region.
Furthermore, although the expenditure in the Northwest and East Midlands showed a similar figure(nearly 420 euros), the West Midlands exceeded by just a minor difference of 20 euros only. Besides this, Yorkshire the Humber and Northeast observed the lowest spendings, as the former stood at exactly 400 euros compared to the latter with 380 euros as weekly spendings.
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1972 and 2001 82
- The table compares international tourism in 2009 and 2010 in 9 countries 62
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... household expenditures followed next by the Southeast, however, the least was ob...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er with 380 euros as weekly spendings.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 923.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18539325843 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70460547892 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 17.0261237188 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 153.833333333 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182616188738 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832638941485 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879436230371 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934765221136 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966303231028 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.